Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Respond to Door Alarm Results in Resident Elopement

Waterford, Connecticut Survey Completed on 12-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when staff failed to respond appropriately to a door alarm, resulting in a resident at risk for elopement exiting the facility unattended. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, depression, and anxiety disorder, was non-ambulatory but able to self-propel in a wheelchair and wore a wanderguard daily. The care plan identified the resident as a wander and elopement risk, with interventions in place such as checking the wanderguard function and placement regularly. Despite these measures, the resident was able to push open an emergency exit door that was not equipped with a wanderguard alarm, exit the building, and was found outside by an off-duty staff member. Staff heard the emergency door alarm but did not witness the resident leaving or immediately check the surrounding area outside the door. The investigation revealed that staff did not exit through the door to search for the resident after the alarm sounded, and some staff were unaware of the code needed to reset the exit door alarm. Facility policies for missing residents and secured exits were requested but not provided. The incident was confirmed through interviews, facility documentation, and review of the resident's clinical records.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙