Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Allow Resident Return After Hospitalization

Bellflower, California Survey Completed on 12-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident with Alzheimer's disease and severe cognitive impairment, who was transferred to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for evaluation and treatment of uncontrollable singing and refusal of activities of daily living, was allowed to return to the facility after being cleared for discharge by the hospital. The resident's records indicated that she was admitted to the facility with significant cognitive decline and behavioral disturbances. Upon transfer to the GACH, the facility provided a bed hold notice and a Notice of Proposed Transfer and Discharge, but the discharge notice was not properly signed by the resident or her family member, and did not specify the required advance notice period. After the resident was stabilized and ready for discharge from the GACH, the hospital's social worker contacted the facility to arrange for her return. The facility's Admissions Coordinator, following direction from the facility's psychiatrist and Administrator, declined to readmit the resident, stating that she required placement in a facility better equipped to handle behavioral issues. This decision was made without giving the resident an opportunity to demonstrate improvement. Despite available beds at the facility, the resident remained in the hospital for 21 days while alternative placement was sought. Facility policy indicated that residents seeking to return after hospitalization should be allowed to return to their previous room or the first available bed, provided they still required the facility's services and met eligibility criteria. However, the facility did not follow this policy in the resident's case, as documented in interviews with facility staff and the GACH social worker. The resident was ultimately transferred to another skilled nursing facility after an extended hospital stay.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙