Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate Resident Assessment Documentation

North Hills, California Survey Completed on 12-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the status of one resident. Specifically, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for this resident indicated that the resident had adequate hearing and no deep tissue injuries, despite multiple sources documenting otherwise. The resident's admission records and weekly wound assessment showed the presence of a deep tissue injury (DTI) on the right heel, and interviews with staff and the resident confirmed significant hearing impairment and the use of hearing aids, which were currently missing. The MDS, however, did not reflect these conditions, listing the resident as having adequate hearing and no DTI. Interviews with facility staff, including the Assistant Administrator, Licensed Vocational Nurse, and Director of Nursing, confirmed the discrepancies between the resident's actual condition and what was documented in the MDS. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the MDS was inaccurate in the sections related to hearing and skin conditions. The facility's policy requires that assessments be accurate and reflective of the resident's status at the time of assessment, but this was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙