Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Notify Residents and Representatives of Transfer/Discharge and Appeal Rights

Burbank, California Survey Completed on 12-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to properly notify residents and their representatives of transfers or discharges, as well as their rights to appeal and information regarding bed-hold policies, for two out of three sampled residents. In the case of the first resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was unable to make decisions, the facility did not ensure that the resident's representative, who held power of attorney and was the legally recognized decision-maker, received the required Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge (NTD). Although the NTD was completed and included necessary information about the transfer and appeal rights, it was not signed by the representative, and the representative later confirmed she did not receive the notice. Staff signed the NTD instead of the resident or representative, contrary to facility policy. For the second resident, who was cognitively intact and able to make decisions, the facility also failed to ensure proper notification procedures were followed. The NTD for this resident was signed by a staff member rather than the resident or their representative. Interviews with staff revealed that if the resident or representative was not present at the time of transfer, the NTD was not mailed to the representative as required. The facility's own policy stated that the NTD should be mailed to the representative the next day if not signed in person, but there was no documentation that this occurred. Interviews with facility leadership, including the DON and Administrator, confirmed that the required notifications were not mailed to the residents' representatives and that the facility's policy and procedure for notification and documentation were not followed. The lack of proper notification meant that the residents' representatives were not informed of their right to appeal the transfer or discharge, nor were they provided with contact information for the Ombudsman or the Department, as required by regulation and facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙