Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Accurately Document Oxygen Device Used During Resident Emergency

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 12-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for one resident by incorrectly documenting the type of oxygen device used during a critical event. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and required moderate assistance with daily activities, experienced desaturation and chest congestion. Documentation in both the Change in Condition Evaluation and Progress Notes indicated that 15 liters of oxygen were administered via a face mask. However, interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Staff Development revealed that a face mask can only deliver up to six liters of oxygen, and that 15 liters should be administered using a non-rebreather mask. The registered nurse involved later confirmed that she had used a non-rebreather mask but documented it incorrectly as a face mask. This inaccurate documentation was acknowledged by both the nurse and the Director of Nursing, who emphasized the importance of precise record-keeping to reflect the actual interventions provided during episodes of low oxygen saturation. The facility's policy on nursing documentation requires that records be concise, clear, pertinent, and accurate, but this standard was not met in this instance, resulting in a medical record that did not accurately communicate the care provided to the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙