Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0580
D

Failure to Notify Responsible Party of One-to-One Monitoring Assignment

Sunland, California Survey Completed on 12-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to inform a resident's responsible party about the initiation of one-to-one monitoring for a resident who was unable to make their own medical decisions. The resident in question was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia following a stroke, aphasia, and was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and unable to make decisions. The resident was identified as being at risk for elopement, had previously worn a wander guard, and had removed the device, refusing its reapplication. As a result, staff began one-to-one monitoring to ensure the resident's safety. Despite this significant change in the resident's care, there was no documentation or evidence that the responsible party was notified about the implementation of one-to-one monitoring. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Staff Development, a Registered Nurse, and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that the responsible party was not informed of this intervention. The responsible party also stated during an interview that neither she nor the former responsible party had been notified about the one-to-one sitter assignment, learning about the removal of the wander guard only through another family member. Facility policy required that family members or responsible parties be notified of any change in condition, with documentation of the notification in the nurses' notes. The care plan and physician's orders did not reflect the one-to-one sitter intervention, and there was no record of communication to the responsible party regarding this change. This omission constituted a failure to uphold the resident's right to have their representative informed of significant changes in treatment and services.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙