Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care Compromising Resident Dignity

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 12-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for three residents who were dependent on staff for toileting and hygiene, resulting in prolonged periods where residents remained soiled. One resident, with diagnoses including muscle weakness, ESRD, and impaired cognitive skills, was left sitting in a soiled incontinence pad for approximately six hours after a bowel movement. The resident had requested assistance multiple times, but after refusing care from the assigned CNA, no alternative staff was arranged in a timely manner. The CNA did not inform the charge nurse when unable to secure another CNA, resulting in a significant delay before care was provided. Another resident, who required partial to moderate assistance for toileting and was at risk for pressure ulcers, experienced a delay of about an hour before receiving incontinence care. The resident had requested to be cleaned and was told by the CNA that care would be provided after attending to another resident. Due to staff shortages, the resident remained soiled for an extended period, which the CNA acknowledged could place the resident at risk for skin breakdown and affect their dignity. A third resident, with hemiplegia and requiring substantial assistance for toileting, also experienced excessive wait times for incontinence care. The resident and a family member reported waiting up to an hour and a half for pericare, with the resident stating that staff did not change her throughout the night shift. The assigned CNA confirmed the delay, citing being occupied with other residents and additional duties. Facility policies reviewed indicated that staff were required to promptly respond to toileting requests and maintain residents' dignity, but these standards were not met in the cited incidents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙