Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Include LAL Mattress in Care Plan for Pressure Injury Prevention

Stockton, California Survey Completed on 12-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan addressing the use of a low air loss (LAL) mattress for a resident with a history of pressure injuries and multiple complex diagnoses, including palliative care, senile degeneration of the brain, vascular dementia, and stage 3 pressure ulcers on the sacral region and left buttock. The resident had an active physician order for a LAL mattress for prophylactic skin management, which was initiated to prevent further skin breakdown and manage existing pressure injuries. Despite the presence of the LAL mattress in the resident's room and its documented use, review of the resident's care plans revealed that this intervention was not included. Interviews with nursing staff and the DON confirmed that the care plan did not reflect the use of the LAL mattress, even though it was a significant intervention for the resident's skin integrity. Staff acknowledged that care plans serve as essential communication tools and guides for providing individualized, person-centered care, and that all physician orders and interventions should be documented in the care plan. The facility's policies and procedures required the development of comprehensive, individualized care plans with measurable objectives and timetables to meet each resident's needs, including interventions for skin integrity management. The DON confirmed that the facility's policy was not followed in this case, as the care plan did not include the LAL mattress intervention, which was necessary for the resident's ongoing skin management and prevention of further pressure injuries.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙