Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Administer Blood Pressure Medication per Physician Parameters

Tucson, Arizona Survey Completed on 12-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that blood pressure medication was administered according to physician-ordered parameters for one resident. The resident had multiple diagnoses, including orthostatic hypotension and hypertension, and was prescribed Midodrine with instructions to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure exceeded 140. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that the medication was marked as administered on several occasions when the resident's systolic blood pressure was above the specified threshold. On some dates, there were no corresponding medication administration notes to explain the deviation, and on other dates, progress notes indicated the medication was held, but the MAR still reflected it as administered. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the medication should not have been given when the systolic blood pressure was above 140, and that the MAR documentation did not always accurately reflect whether the medication was administered or held. The facility's policy required medications to be administered in accordance with prescriber orders and for staff to document administration in the electronic MAR after each dose. The failure to follow these procedures resulted in the administration of medication outside of prescribed parameters and inconsistent documentation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙