Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
E

Incomplete Documentation of Blood Glucose Monitoring

Phoenix, Arizona Survey Completed on 12-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the medical record for a resident with type 1 diabetes was complete and accurate regarding blood glucose (BS) monitoring. The resident had multiple physician orders for frequent BS checks and insulin administration, including the use of both fingerstick (accucheck) and a continuous glucose monitoring device (Dexcom G7). Despite these orders, there was a lack of consistent documentation of BS readings in the medical record, including the Medication Administration Record (MAR), progress notes, and vitals log. On numerous occasions, BS values were either missing, not recorded as numerical values, or only noted as 'high' or 'low' without further detail. There were also instances where the resident refused BS checks or insulin, but the attempts and outcomes were not always fully documented. Interviews with nursing staff and the DON revealed that the facility did not have a specific policy for BS monitoring and relied on physician orders to guide practice. Staff reported that BS values should be recorded on the MAR, but review of the MAR for the relevant months showed no such documentation. Staff also indicated that the process for ensuring BS monitoring orders were properly reflected in the MAR was not always followed, as the nurse practitioner entering the order did not select the necessary options to trigger MAR documentation. Additionally, there was confusion among staff regarding the interpretation of the Dexcom device readings and when to notify providers of abnormal results. The resident involved had a complex medical history, including type 1 diabetes, cerebral infarction, and dementia, and required close monitoring of blood glucose levels. The care plan did not include specific interventions for BS monitoring with either the accucheck or Dexcom device. Throughout the period reviewed, there were multiple days with missing or incomplete BS documentation, and on several occasions, there was no evidence that providers were notified of abnormal BS readings or that appropriate follow-up occurred. The lack of complete and accurate documentation could result in an incomplete medical record for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙