Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Respond to Wander Guard Alarm Leads to Resident Elopement

Anchorage, Alaska Survey Completed on 12-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident identified as high risk for elopement, with diagnoses including a displaced hip fracture, chronic kidney disease, schizophrenia, and anxiety, was not adequately supervised despite being on wander guard precautions. The resident had a documented history of exit-seeking behaviors and was assessed as cognitively impaired and unable to make independent decisions. The care plan included interventions such as the use of a wander guard, routine checks of the device, and monitoring for elopement risk, but did not specify staff response protocols for wander guard alarms. On the day of the incident, the resident left the facility by calling a cab and was able to exit through the front door. Although the wander guard alarm was triggered, staff did not respond to the alarm, and there was no one present at the front desk to intervene. The absence of immediate action allowed the resident to leave the premises undetected for approximately two and a half hours. Staff only became aware of the resident's absence when attempting to deliver medications and meals, at which point a search was initiated. The resident was eventually found stranded at a local store by members of the public and returned to the facility. Review of facility policies revealed that while the use of wander guards and care plan updates were required, there was a lack of clear guidance on staff roles and required actions when a wander guard alarm was activated. This contributed to the delayed response and failure to prevent the resident's elopement.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙