Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0810
D

Failure to Provide Adaptive Eating Equipment and Assistance

Humble, Texas Survey Completed on 11-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide special eating equipment and utensils for a resident who required them, as well as appropriate assistance during meals. The resident, a male with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and moderate cognitive impairment, was observed multiple times struggling to get food onto his spoon and experiencing food spillage while eating both in the dining area and in bed. Despite these difficulties, the resident was served meals on a regular plate without any adaptive devices such as a plate guard, and there was no evidence of referral to occupational or speech therapy for assessment of assistive devices. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident needed assistance with meals and that adaptive equipment, such as a divided plate, would be beneficial. The facility's policy required that residents who could benefit from adaptive devices be provided with them, but this was not followed in the resident's case. The care plan and provider orders did not address the need for assistive devices, and staff acknowledged the risk of inadequate nutrition due to the lack of proper assistance and equipment.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙