Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Assess and Document Medical Need for Bed Rail Use

Houston, Texas Survey Completed on 11-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from the use of physical restraints, specifically bed rails, without proper evaluation for medical necessity. Three residents were observed with both side bed rails raised on their beds, yet none had physician orders or documented assessments justifying the use of bed rails. Interviews with residents and their representatives revealed that the bed rails were not requested by the residents and were instead implemented by staff, often as a measure to prevent falls. One resident was observed attempting to get out of bed while the bed rails were up, indicating a lack of individualized assessment for their use. Staff interviews demonstrated inconsistent understanding and application of restraint policies. Some staff members believed that bed rails did not require a physician's order and did not consider them restraints, while others stated that an order and assessment were necessary. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the facility aimed to be restraint-free but admitted that bed rails were used for mobility assistance and to prevent falls, despite some incidents of bruises and skin tears associated with their use. There was no evidence that residents had been properly assessed for the risks and benefits of bed rail use, nor that informed consent had been obtained prior to installation. Facility policy required assessment for risk of entrapment, review of risks and benefits, and informed consent before bed rails were used, but these steps were not documented or followed for the residents in question. Observations confirmed that bed rails were in use for multiple residents during the survey, and staff interviews further highlighted a lack of training and awareness regarding restraint policies and the potential for bed rails to be considered restraints.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙