Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding of Resident Fall

San Antonio, Texas Survey Completed on 11-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected a resident's status regarding falls. Specifically, a male resident on hospice care with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the kidney, muscle wasting, and anxiety experienced a fall in his room while reaching for a blanket. The incident was documented in the facility's risk management system and in progress notes, with no injuries observed and appropriate notifications made to the physician, DON, and responsible party. Interventions, such as adding bed bolsters, were implemented and documented in the care plan. Despite the fall being documented in multiple records and discussed among staff, the resident's subsequent quarterly MDS assessment was coded as having had no falls since the prior assessment. The RNAC responsible for completing the MDS stated that her process for identifying falls included attending interdisciplinary meetings and reviewing risk management reports. However, she acknowledged that she coded the MDS incorrectly, indicating no falls, despite the existence of a risk management report documenting the incident. Interviews with the RNAC, DON, and administrator revealed a belief that the miscoding on the MDS would not impact the resident's care as long as the care plan was accurate and interventions were in place. The facility's policy requires that each resident receives an accurate assessment and that the MDS serves as the clinical basis for care planning and delivery. In this case, the MDS assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's fall history, constituting a deficiency in assessment accuracy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙