Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Resident Care

Austin, Texas Survey Completed on 11-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program by not ensuring that enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented during care for a resident with a colostomy. The resident, an 85-year-old female with multiple diagnoses including dementia, hemiplegia, diabetes, and colostomy status, required EBP as indicated in her care plan. Observations revealed that while EBP signage and personal protective equipment (PPE) were present, staff did not consistently follow the required protocols. Specifically, two CNAs provided peri care and emptied the resident's colostomy bag while wearing gloves but failed to don gowns as required by EBP guidelines. Interviews with these CNAs indicated a lack of understanding and inconsistent application of EBP, with one CNA admitting to not always wearing a gown and being unable to explain the precautions, and the other stating she did not notice the EBP sign and sometimes omitted the gown. In contrast, a CMA was observed following proper EBP protocol by wearing both gown and gloves during resident care. Further interviews with facility leadership, including the DON, ADON, and Administrator, confirmed expectations that staff should wear gowns and gloves for residents on EBP, particularly during high-contact care activities. However, the ADON was unable to provide recent signed in-service documentation for EBP training, and there was acknowledgment that staff education on EBP had been reviewed but not consistently documented. The facility's policy outlined the requirements for EBP, including targeted gown and glove use during high-contact care, but these were not consistently followed in practice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙