Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Cognitively Impaired Resident

Whitesboro, Texas Survey Completed on 09-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls had reasonable accommodation of needs, specifically regarding access to the call light system. On the date of observation, the resident was found lying in bed with the call light cord on the floor, approximately two feet away from the head of the bed, making it inaccessible. The resident, who had dementia, poor vision, and required staff assistance for self-care, was unable to use the call light and did not respond to questions about its use due to cognitive limitations. Staff interviews confirmed that the call light was supposed to be clipped near the resident's pillow and within reach, but this was not the case during the observation. Further interviews with facility staff, including a CNA, LVN, the Administrator, DON, and ADON, revealed that it was the expectation for all residents to have access to their call lights for safety and to request assistance. However, the facility did not have a specific policy regarding call light placement, and staff were expected to monitor and ensure accessibility during rounds. The lack of a policy and failure to ensure the call light was within reach for this resident constituted a deficiency in accommodating the resident's needs and preferences as outlined in the care plan.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙