Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0567
D

Failure to Follow Policy for Resident Trust Fund Disbursements

Lancaster, Texas Survey Completed on 11-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to properly safeguard and manage the personal funds of a resident by not following its own policy requiring two staff signatures when cash was disbursed from the resident trust fund. Multiple withdrawals were made for one resident, each signed only by the resident and lacking the required witness signature. The facility's policy specifically mandates that when a resident cannot sign to approve a withdrawal, a witness signature is required, and the witness must not be the person responsible for accounting for the funds, their supervisor, or the individual accepting the withdrawn funds. However, review of the trust fund petty cash logs revealed several instances where cash was withdrawn and only the business office manager's (BOM) signature was present, with no witness signature documented. The resident involved had a history of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, cataracts, choroidal atrophy, transient visual loss, and major depressive disorder. The resident was assessed as having impaired vision and a BIMS score indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Interviews with the resident confirmed that she regularly requested and received varying amounts of cash, which she kept in her possession and used for personal purchases. The resident was able to account for her money and provided receipts for some purchases, but discrepancies in the amounts withdrawn and the amounts reportedly received were noted during the investigation. Interviews with facility and corporate staff confirmed that the BOM did not consistently follow the required procedure for cash disbursement, as some transactions had witnesses while others did not. The issue was identified during a corporate audit, which led to further review of the records. Although the facility and corporate staff did not find evidence of missing funds, the lack of adherence to the required process for safeguarding resident funds constituted a deficiency in the facility's management of resident trust funds.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙