Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Readmit Resident After Inappropriate Discharge Determination

Hebbronville, Texas Survey Completed on 10-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to readmit a resident after a hearing officer determined that the resident's discharge was inappropriate and ordered the facility to allow the resident to return. The resident, who had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and intact cognition, was originally discharged due to verbally abusive behaviors and alleged endangerment to others. Despite the hearing officer's directive to readmit the resident, the facility did not comply, citing the refusal of the medical director and primary physician to treat the resident and a lack of other available physicians willing to accept the resident. Interviews with facility staff, including the medical director, DON, and administrator, confirmed that the decision not to readmit the resident was based on the physician's refusal to provide care and the absence of alternative physicians. The administrator acknowledged that no efforts were made to find another physician for the resident. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide a policy outlining proper discharge procedures when requested. The facility's response to the hearing decision stated that no action was required due to the lack of a physician to accept the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙