Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Complete Thorough Skin Assessment on Readmission

Corpus Chrisit, Texas Survey Completed on 10-27-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a licensed vocational nurse (LVN) failed to complete a thorough and accurate head-to-toe assessment for a male resident with multiple diagnoses, including cerebral infarction, muscle wasting, intellectual disabilities, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis, upon his readmission to the facility. The resident had a Coban wrap on his right arm, and the care plan specifically addressed an actual impairment to skin integrity at the right antecubital fossa related to the Coban wrap. Despite this, the LVN did not assess what was under the dressing/bandage during the initial assessment, and there was no documentation or mention of the resident's arm in the progress notes for several days following readmission. The resident was noted to have a dressing on his arm for approximately eight days without any clinical staff member assessing underneath it. The LVN reported that she noticed the dressing upon the resident's return but did not remove it or insist on assessing the underlying skin, citing the resident's resistance to care. The LVN acknowledged in hindsight that she should have advocated more strongly to assess under the dressing, as this is part of her professional responsibilities and necessary to ensure there were no negative outcomes such as loss of circulation or skin breakdown. The resident did not express or exhibit any signs or symptoms of distress during this period, and when interviewed, he recalled the incident but had no current concerns. An external advocate and the Director of Nursing (DON) both confirmed that the dressing remained in place for several days and that a thorough assessment should have been completed upon readmission. The facility's protocols and clinical guidelines require examination of the skin under all dressings for new admissions and readmissions, but this was not followed in this instance. The failure to assess under the Coban wrap could have compromised the resident's skin integrity, as noted in the report.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙