Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Timely Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident with Wounds

Greenville, Texas Survey Completed on 11-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a resident who was admitted with multiple wounds and a history of MRSA. Upon admission, the resident had a right femur fracture, several pressure ulcers, a deep tissue injury, and a recent surgical history, including a hip replacement and right lung lobectomy. Despite these risk factors, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were not implemented until six days after admission, as evidenced by the Medication Administration Record and order summary. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent understanding and implementation of EBP, with several nursing assistants and licensed nurses relying on posted signs or direct communication to determine when EBP was required, rather than a systematic approach at admission. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that EBP should have been initiated upon admission for residents with open wounds, and could not explain the delay in this case. The facility's infection control policy required transmission-based precautions when standard precautions were insufficient, but this protocol was not followed for the resident in question. The deficiency was identified through record review and staff interviews, which confirmed that the lack of timely EBP implementation placed the resident and others at risk for cross-contamination and infection spread.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙