Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Ensure Staff Use PPE During Enhanced Barrier Precautions

Gilmer, Texas Survey Completed on 11-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that staff consistently followed infection prevention and control protocols, specifically Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), when providing care to a resident with multiple risk factors for infection. On the date in question, two CNAs provided incontinent care to a resident who had a Foley catheter, gastrostomy tube, and a wound, without wearing the required personal protective equipment (PPE). This was confirmed through photo evidence submitted by a responsible party, which showed the staff members not wearing PPE during the care activity. Both CNAs had completed EBP training prior to the incident, and facility records indicated that PPE was available and that signage and supplies were in place to support compliance with EBP protocols. The resident involved was an older male with significant medical complexity, including end stage renal disease, osteomyelitis, heart failure, neuromuscular bladder dysfunction, a gastrostomy, peripheral vascular disease, and a below-the-knee amputation. He was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living, including toileting and mobility, and was unable to complete a BIMS assessment. The care plan and physician orders specified that the resident was to be on EBP due to his Foley catheter, gastrostomy tube, and chronic wounds, with interventions including staff and family education, signage, and ready access to PPE. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistent understanding and application of EBP protocols. One CNA could not recall if PPE was worn during the incident and admitted to not always using PPE, while the other CNA demonstrated a lack of understanding regarding when gowns were required. Other staff, including the ADON, DON, and additional CNAs, acknowledged the importance of EBP and the availability of PPE, but also noted ongoing challenges with staff compliance despite repeated in-servicing. Facility policy required PPE use for high-contact care activities for residents on EBP, but the observed failure to follow these protocols led to the identified deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙