Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Update Care Plan with Fall Prevention Interventions After Resident Fall

Gainesville, Texas Survey Completed on 10-18-2025

Penalty

Fine: $21,530
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident following a fall, as required by policy and regulation. After the resident, who had a history of falls and multiple high-risk diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and a recent femur fracture, experienced an unwitnessed fall, the care plan was not promptly updated to reflect new fall prevention interventions or the need for 1:1 supervision. Although staff verbally discussed and implemented increased supervision, this intervention was not formally documented in the resident's care plan or communicated consistently across all shifts. The resident was identified as high risk for falls upon admission, with a Fall Risk Assessment score indicating the need for heightened precautions. Despite this, after the initial fall, the care plan interventions remained generic and did not include specific, measurable objectives or timeframes tailored to the resident's updated needs. Staff interviews revealed that while there was an understanding among caregivers and nurses that the resident required constant monitoring, this was not reflected in the written care plan or the Kardex, which serves as a quick reference for CNAs. Facility policy required that care plans be updated immediately following a fall or change in condition, with new interventions documented by the end of the shift. However, both nursing and administrative staff acknowledged that the care plan was not revised in a timely manner to include the 1:1 supervision intervention. This lack of documentation and formal communication led to inconsistencies in care and delayed the implementation of necessary safety measures for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙