Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Post Enhanced Barrier Precautions Signage for Resident with Permcath

Mcallen, Texas Survey Completed on 09-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program by not posting Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage for a resident who had a permcath for dialysis. The resident, a female recently admitted with diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis, diabetes mellitus, acute kidney failure, and hypertensive heart disease, required EBP due to the presence of an indwelling medical device. The care plan and physician orders indicated the need for EBP, including the use of gowns and gloves for high-contact care activities, and the facility's policy required signage to alert staff to these precautions. Despite these requirements, observations revealed that no EBP sign was posted on the resident's door. Interviews with nursing staff, including an LVN, the ADON, and the DON, confirmed that the resident should have been under EBP from the date of re-admission and that the absence of signage was an oversight. Staff acknowledged that the lack of signage could result in staff not taking proper infection control precautions when providing care to the resident. The facility's own policy, reviewed as part of the investigation, specified that EBP signage should be posted for residents with indwelling medical devices such as permcaths. The failure to post the required signage was attributed to staff oversight, with multiple staff members confirming their responsibility to ensure signage was in place and acknowledging that it had not been done.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙