Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Two Residents

Rockwall, Texas Survey Completed on 10-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two residents had access to their call light systems, as required by their care plans and facility policy. For one resident with a history of left femur fracture and moderate cognitive impairment, the call light was found inside her nightstand and not within her reach while she was lying in bed. The resident was unable to identify the location of her call light when asked. For another resident with severe cognitive impairment and muscle weakness, the call light was located on the side of the bed against the wall, also out of reach, and the resident did not know where it was. Both residents required substantial assistance with activities of daily living and had care plans specifying that call lights should be within reach. Multiple staff interviews confirmed that call lights are expected to be within reach of all residents and that staff are responsible for checking this during regular rounds. Despite these expectations and documented in-service training on the subject, observations on the day of the survey revealed that the call lights for both residents were not accessible. Staff acknowledged the importance of call light accessibility for resident safety and indicated that rounds were conducted to check for this, but the deficiency was still observed during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙