Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0838
F

Facility Assessment Lacks Staffing Level Information

Galveston, Texas Survey Completed on 11-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that its facility-wide assessment included information regarding the level of staff needed to meet the needs of each resident during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Record review of the facility assessment dated 4/30/25 revealed that it did not contain details about staffing levels required to provide competent care for residents. The facility's policy states that the assessment should inform staffing decisions and consider staffing needs for each shift, but this was not reflected in the actual assessment document. During an interview, the Administrator acknowledged uncertainty about whether the facility assessment included staffing level information and confirmed that the assessment was not used when creating the nursing staff schedule. Instead, staffing decisions were based on the facility's PPD (per patient day) and census, with a CNA-to-resident ratio of 1:15. The Administrator also referenced the facility's star rating and national staffing averages but did not indicate that individual resident needs or the facility assessment were used to determine staffing levels.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙