Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
J

Failure to Prevent Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Monitoring

Port Arthur, Texas Survey Completed on 09-22-2025

Penalty

Fine: $45,805
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement incident involving a male resident with severe cognitive impairment, a history of behavioral issues, and recent aggressive and exit-seeking behaviors. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit and generalized anxiety disorder, had a BIMS score indicating severe cognitive impairment and was independently ambulatory. Despite a care plan noting behavioral problems and interventions, the resident's risk for elopement was not initially recognized as high, and monitoring protocols were inconsistently implemented. On the day of the incident, the resident was able to leave the facility through an unlocked door, which had no keycode or alarm, and was found by staff approximately 50 feet off the premises in a hazardous area with tall grass, rocks, and uneven ground. Staff interviews revealed that the 15-minute monitoring checks ordered for the resident were not consistently performed or documented, and several staff members were unaware of the monitoring requirement. The DON did not provide specific instructions on how to monitor the resident or what behaviors to observe, nor was a staff member designated to be responsible for the checks. Additionally, the facility lacked physical security measures such as wander guards or door alarms, and residents could exit the building freely. Further interviews indicated that staff were unable to adequately supervise the resident due to competing responsibilities and lack of clear communication. The monitoring sheets for the resident contained missing or incomplete documentation, and staff reported being unable to perform checks during medication passes or breaks. The facility's elopement policy required identification of at-risk residents and specific interventions, but these were not effectively implemented prior to the incident, resulting in the resident's unsupervised exit from the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙