Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
E

Incomplete Discharge Summaries and Missing Physician Signatures

El Paso, Texas Survey Completed on 11-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide complete and compliant discharge summaries for three residents who were reviewed for discharge documentation. Each resident's discharge summary lacked essential information, such as a recapitulation of the resident's stay, including diagnoses, course of illness or treatment, pertinent laboratory and radiology results, and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge. In several cases, sections of the discharge summary were left blank, including prognosis, special treatments or procedures, medical information, cognitive and psychosocial status, sensory and physical impairments, dental condition, and status upon discharge. Additionally, the discharge summaries were not signed by the attending physician as required. For the residents involved, the records showed that they had complex medical histories, including conditions such as upper respiratory infection, ureteral stones, obstructive uropathy, pyelonephritis, Alzheimer's dementia, chronic urinary tract infection, hydronephrosis, and post-surgical rehabilitation needs. Discharge planning was initiated upon admission, and arrangements for home health services, therapy, and follow-up with primary care providers were documented in progress notes and care plans. However, the official discharge summaries did not reflect a comprehensive account of the residents' medical status or the care provided during their stay, nor did they consistently document vaccine administration or declination. Interviews with facility staff, including nurses, the DON, and medical records personnel, revealed inconsistent practices regarding the completion and physician signature of discharge summaries. Staff reported that discharge summaries were completed by nurses at the time of discharge and were supposed to be signed by the physician, but in practice, this was not consistently done. The medical records staff also indicated that some discharge documents had not yet been scanned into the electronic medical record. Facility policies required that discharge summaries be provided to residents and included in the medical record, with specific content requirements that were not met in these cases.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙