Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Ensure Timely Oncology Follow-Up for Resident with Cancer

South Pasadena, California Survey Completed on 11-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident with non-Hodgkin lymphoma received all necessary services, specifically a scheduled oncology appointment as prescribed upon discharge from an acute care hospital. The resident, who also had end stage renal disease, heart failure, and adult failure to thrive, was admitted with orders for outpatient treatment with rituximab and a follow-up appointment with an oncologist. Documentation showed that the resident did not attend the scheduled oncology appointment due to insurance issues, and there was no evidence in the medical record that the primary care physician was notified of the missed appointment or that the appointment was rescheduled. Interviews with the DON and the resident's primary care physician confirmed that facility staff did not follow protocol to notify the physician or reschedule the missed specialist appointment. The facility's policy required timely and coordinated referrals to medical specialists, including documentation and follow-up, but these steps were not taken. As a result, the resident did not receive an evaluation and treatment plan for their cancer as prescribed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙