Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Delay in Stat EEG Due to Unverified Verbal Hold Order

Culver City, California Survey Completed on 11-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a stat (immediate) EEG order for a resident was not completed as directed by the physician. The resident, who had been admitted with acute respiratory failure, had a stat EEG ordered by a covering physician. The EEG was a contracted service to be performed by an outside technician. Although the technician arrived to perform the test, the house neurologist verbally instructed the technician to hold off on conducting the EEG, despite not being the ordering provider and without a written order to do so. The EEG was subsequently delayed until the following day. Facility policy indicated that non-emergent verbal orders should not be accepted, and emergent verbal orders must be signed by the physician prior to leaving the nursing unit. In this case, the verbal instruction to hold the EEG was not documented as a formal order, and the technician did not consult the ordering provider or inform the assigned nurse about the hold. This sequence of actions and inactions resulted in the stat EEG not being performed as ordered.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙