Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Obtain Physician Orders, Informed Consents, and Complete Wound Assessments for Debridement Procedures

Brea, California Survey Completed on 09-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to physician orders, resident preferences, and goals for one resident. Specifically, the facility did not obtain the required physician's orders and informed consents prior to performing bedside debridement procedures on the resident's scrotal and perineal/perianal wounds. Facility policy required a new and separate consent for each debridement session, and the procedure listed on the consent was to match the physician's order. However, review of the medical record showed that for two debridement procedures, there were no corresponding physician orders, and for one of the procedures, no informed consent was obtained or signed. Additionally, the consent obtained for one procedure did not match the procedure actually performed, as documented in the physician's operative report. Further, the facility failed to ensure that wound assessments were completed after the bedside debridement procedures. According to facility policy and staff interviews, wound assessments should be performed after each debridement, including documentation of wound measurements, drainage, and tissue type. Review of the resident's wound assessments revealed that after the debridement procedures, there was no documentation of wound measurements or assessments for the scrotal and perineal/perianal wounds. This lack of documentation occurred both immediately following the procedures and in subsequent weekly assessments. The resident involved had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and was admitted with significant wounds requiring ongoing care. Despite the complexity of the resident's condition and the need for careful monitoring, the facility did not follow its own policies regarding consent, physician orders, and wound assessment documentation. These failures were confirmed by interviews with the DON and LVN, who acknowledged that the required documentation and consents were missing from the medical record.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙