Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Ensure Resident Discharge Location Met Needs and Preferences

West Covina, California Survey Completed on 11-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's discharge location met the resident's needs for family support and resources. The resident, who had a history of pneumonia and falls, required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living and mobility, as documented in the Minimum Data Set and Physical Therapy Discharge Summary. Despite these needs, the discharge planning process did not provide the resident or their family member with choices regarding potential discharge locations. The family member reported that no options were offered and that the only assisted living facility (ALF) presented was provided on the day of discharge, leaving insufficient time to evaluate alternatives or appeal the decision due to external circumstances. Interviews with facility staff, including the case manager, social services director, and director of nursing, confirmed that the resident and family were not given a list of ALFs to consider and that there was no documentation of other options being discussed. The case manager indicated that the ALF was found within 48 hours before discharge, and the family was informed that if they did not agree to the transfer, they would need to pay for additional days until a safe placement was found. The facility's policy required assisting residents in selecting a post-acute care provider relevant to their goals and preferences, but this was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙