Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Ensure Safe and Appropriate Discharge Placement

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 09-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure a safe and appropriate discharge for a resident by not following the physician's order and the resident's stated preference for discharge to a Board and Care facility. The resident, who had diagnoses including hypertension, glaucoma, lack of coordination, and protein-calorie malnutrition, required supervision or assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, transferring, and toileting. The care plan and physician's order specified discharge to a Board and Care with home health services for physical and occupational therapy, as well as nursing support for medication compliance. However, the resident was instead discharged to a recuperative care facility, which is intended for individuals recovering from illness and experiencing homelessness, and does not provide the level of care or services required by the resident. Interviews and record reviews revealed that there was miscommunication between the facility's social worker, the Director of Patient Care, and other staff regarding the discharge destination. The Director of Patient Care and the case manager both confirmed that the resident was discharged to a recuperative care facility rather than a Board and Care, and that the facility did not verify whether the placement met the resident's needs or was safe. The resident expressed discomfort and fear upon arrival at the recuperative care facility, noting concerns about safety and the environment, and subsequently left the facility on his own. The facility's own policy required that discharges meet specific criteria, including resident notification, orientation, and documentation. The Director of Nursing and the administrator acknowledged that the discharge did not follow the physician's order or the resident's preference, and that the facility failed to screen the discharge location to ensure it was appropriate and safe for the resident. This resulted in an inappropriate discharge that did not meet the resident's needs or preferences.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙