Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0695
D

Failure to Provide Appropriate Oxygen Therapy for Resident with Low Oxygen Saturation

Chatsworth, California Survey Completed on 09-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice for a resident with a history of respiratory failure, prostate cancer, and dementia. The resident, who had severely impaired cognition and required significant assistance with daily activities, was admitted with physician orders to receive oxygen at 2 to 5 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula, with instructions to titrate oxygen if saturation fell below 90%. On the morning in question, the resident was documented to have an oxygen saturation level of 80% while receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. Despite the low oxygen saturation, there was no documented evidence that staff increased the oxygen flow rate or administered high concentration oxygen using a non-rebreather mask prior to the arrival of paramedics. Interviews with the DON and a registered nurse confirmed that the resident continued to receive oxygen at 5 LPM via nasal cannula and was not switched to a non-rebreather mask. The facility's own policy required staff to adjust oxygen delivery devices and flow rates as needed and to document all assessment data and interventions, but this was not done in this case. When paramedics arrived, they found the resident with an oxygen saturation of 83% on 4 LPM via nasal cannula, a heart rate of 122, and a respiratory rate of 41. Paramedics questioned facility staff about the lack of appropriate oxygen therapy, but no explanation was provided. The paramedics then administered oxygen at 15 LPM via non-rebreather mask and provided additional care before transferring the resident to the hospital.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙