Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessment for Hospice Resident

Yucaipa, California Survey Completed on 11-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment for one resident who was receiving hospice care. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, specifically Section O which documents special treatments and programs, was completed by the MDS Director but did not indicate that the resident was under hospice care, despite documentation in the clinical census and physician's orders confirming hospice services. During interviews and record reviews, the MDS Director acknowledged responsibility for completing Section O and confirmed that the resident should have been coded as receiving hospice care, but was not. Further review of facility policy revealed that assessments are to be completed by qualified staff and must accurately reflect the resident's status, with all contributors attesting to the accuracy of the information. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the assessment was inaccurate and that facility policy was not followed in this instance. The resident involved had diagnoses including COPD and cirrhosis of the liver and was admitted to hospice care, but this was not reflected in the MDS assessment.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙