Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0552
D

Failure to Obtain Informed Consent from Court-Appointed Conservator for Psychoactive Medications

Torrance, California Survey Completed on 11-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the court-appointed Conservator, assigned by the Los Angeles County Office of the Public Guardian, was informed of the risks and benefits of psychoactive medications prescribed to a resident with schizophrenia and severely impaired cognition. Instead, informed consent for the use of Quetiapine Fumarate and Aripiprazole was obtained from the resident's family member (FM), not the Conservator, despite documentation indicating the Conservator was the legal decision-maker for the resident. The resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and had a diagnosis of schizophrenia with severe cognitive impairment, as documented in the Minimum Data Set and admission records. Record review showed that the facility's policy required identification of a surrogate decision-maker, including public guardians, to provide informed consent for treatment. However, the Director of Nursing acknowledged that staff were unaware of the Conservator's appointment and obtained consent from the FM instead. As a result, the Conservator was not informed about the resident's prescribed psychoactive medications and was unable to make decisions regarding the resident's care, contrary to legal and facility policy requirements.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙