Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Monitoring

Salinas, California Survey Completed on 11-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to adequately monitor and supervise a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a known history of exit-seeking behavior. The resident, who had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, alcohol dependence, depression, muscle weakness, and impaired mobility, was assessed as being at risk for elopement. Despite this, the resident was able to leave the facility on multiple occasions without staff knowledge. Documentation showed that the resident's care plan identified the risk and included interventions such as a wander guard device, increased supervision, and ensuring the resident's bedroom screen door was locked. On several occasions, the resident was found outside the facility or attempting to leave, sometimes without the wander guard in place or with the device removed. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in the implementation and documentation of increased supervision and 1:1 monitoring. There was also a lack of clarity and evidence regarding how these interventions were carried out. Orders were in place for frequent monitoring and checking the wander guard, but the resident was still able to exit the facility undetected, and staff did not always hear the wander guard alarm or find the device after incidents. The facility's failure to consistently implement and document the required supervision and monitoring interventions, as well as to ensure the effectiveness of the wander guard system, resulted in repeated incidents where the resident left the premises without staff awareness. This lack of adequate supervision and monitoring directly contributed to the deficiency cited in the report.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙