Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
G

Failure to Monitor and Document Catheter Output and Assess for Complications

Minocqua, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 09-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice for residents with indwelling Foley and suprapubic catheters, resulting in inadequate monitoring and documentation of urinary output, as well as insufficient assessment and provider notification when abnormal findings were present. For three residents with catheters, there were repeated instances where urine output was either not documented, documented as zero without further assessment, or recorded with unclear or missing amounts. In multiple cases, there was no evidence that the provider was notified when urine output was absent for a shift, as required by physician orders and facility policy. One resident with a suprapubic catheter experienced two days of increased incontinence and lack of catheter drainage, which was not properly assessed or reported. The resident was ultimately transferred to the hospital and admitted with a severe urinary tract infection. Review of the medical record showed multiple shifts with zero urine output documented and no corresponding provider notification or additional nursing assessments, such as checking catheter patency, vital signs, or abdominal assessment. Interviews with nursing staff revealed a lack of clear parameters for when to notify providers and inconsistent understanding of required assessments when abnormal output was noted. For two other residents with indwelling catheters, similar deficiencies were observed. Documentation of urinary output was frequently missing, incomplete, or unclear, and there was no evidence of provider notification or further assessment when output was zero or not recorded. Facility policies and professional standards require accurate monitoring and reporting of catheter output to prevent complications, but these were not consistently followed, as evidenced by the surveyor's review of records and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙