Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Individualized Trauma-Informed Care Plan

Florence, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 10-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, comprehensive, resident-centered care plan for a resident identified as having trauma. The resident had a history of chronic medical conditions, including COPD, alcoholic polyneuropathy, alcoholic cirrhosis with ascites, type 2 diabetes, and respiratory failure with hypoxia. Despite quarterly assessments indicating the resident experienced trauma related to life-threatening illness and exposure to combat and captivity, the resident's diagnoses list did not include a trauma-related diagnosis, and the care plan lacked resident-specific trauma interventions. The care plan in place contained general statements and non-specific interventions, such as determining triggers and de-escalation preferences, providing a safe environment, and referring to psychology as indicated. However, it did not specify the resident's actual trauma triggers or preferred interventions, even though the resident had communicated these during assessments. Staff interviews revealed that multiple team members, including RNs, CNAs, the DON, the Unit Manager, the MDS Coordinator, and the Social Services Coordinator, were unaware of the resident's trauma history, triggers, or specific interventions. Staff consistently stated that care plans should be personalized and include specific triggers and interventions to guide care, but this was not done for the resident in question. An incident occurred in which the resident was physically assaulted by another resident, resulting in significant distress and ongoing upset for the affected resident. Staff were not aware of how to respond to the resident's trauma or triggers following the incident, as the care plan did not provide the necessary individualized information. The Social Services Coordinator, who had signed off on the trauma assessments, acknowledged that the care plan should have been edited to include the resident's specific trauma and triggers but had not done so. This lack of individualized planning and communication led to staff being unprepared to meet the resident's trauma-related needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙