Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0583
D

Failure to Ensure Resident Privacy During Care Due to Visitor Presence

Watertown, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 12-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident who was dependent on staff for toileting, transfers, dressing, and hygiene reported a lack of privacy during personal care in a double occupancy room. The resident, who had intact cognition and multiple medical diagnoses including muscle wasting, osteoarthritis, pain syndrome, and mental health disorders, expressed discomfort with a male visitor being present in the room while care was provided. The resident observed the male visitor retrieving items from a refrigerator during these times, which made the resident uncomfortable, and communicated this concern to nursing staff. Interviews with staff confirmed awareness of the resident's discomfort, but there was no facility policy regarding visitors in the room during care. Staff indicated that if a resident reported a concern, they could ask the visitor to step out, but this was not consistently enforced. The facility administrator acknowledged knowledge of the situation but did not follow up with other residents to identify similar concerns or provide staff education to prevent recurrence. The lack of a clear policy and consistent practice led to inadequate privacy for the resident during care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙