Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0925
F

Deficient Pest Control Program Resulting in Persistent Fly Infestation

Kenosha, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 09-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to address the presence of flies throughout the building, as evidenced by observations, interviews, and record reviews. Multiple residents with intact cognition reported ongoing issues with flies in their rooms and common areas, particularly when food was present or garbage was not promptly removed. Surveyors directly observed flies in resident rooms, hallways, and near the kitchen, as well as fly swatters kept by residents' beds for personal use. Staff interviews confirmed that the fly problem was persistent and had been reported to management multiple times, but staff were unsure if any effective action had been taken. The facility's pest control policy required the use of various methods, including engagement with an outside pest service, to control seasonal pests such as flies. However, maintenance staff indicated that the pest control company was not contacted regarding the current fly issue, as they believed the number of flies was typical for the facility. Instead, staff relied on manual methods such as using fly swatters and bug zappers at main exits. The issue was particularly pronounced in areas near exterior doors and dumpsters, and both residents and staff expressed frustration with the ongoing presence of flies despite repeated reports and complaints.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙