Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
E

Failure to Prevent Resident Skin Irritation from Laundry Detergent

Logan, West Virginia Survey Completed on 10-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were protected from skin irritation and rashes associated with the use of a specific laundry detergent known to cause such reactions. During the survey, it was found that the blue detergent, which had previously caused outbreaks of rashes and itchiness among approximately half of the residents (from neck to feet, but not on hands or face), was still being stored and used in the facility. Record review and staff interviews confirmed that the hypoallergenic detergent was intended for use, but when it was unavailable, staff substituted the blue detergent, despite being aware of its adverse effects on residents. Observation in the laundry area revealed both the blue and a clear detergent present, with the blue detergent still accessible and connected for use. The laundry aide confirmed that the blue detergent was used as a backup and acknowledged that its use led to skin issues among residents. The administrator was unaware that the blue detergent remained in use, despite previous complaints and known skin-related concerns. This sequence of actions and inactions resulted in a substantiated deficiency affecting all residents reviewed during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙