Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
D

Failure to Prevent Repeated Elopements Due to Inadequate Supervision and Monitoring

Charleston, West Virginia Survey Completed on 11-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring to prevent repeated elopements for a resident identified as being at risk for wandering and exit-seeking behaviors. Over a nine-month period, the resident exhibited more than 20 instances of exit-seeking or attempted elopement, with five successful elopements, including one incident where the resident was found at a local emergency room after leaving the facility. Documentation showed that the resident had a history of wandering, was assessed as high risk for elopement, and wore a wander guard bracelet since admission. Despite these risk factors and repeated incidents, the care plan interventions remained unchanged and did not include increased supervision or more frequent monitoring. Staff interviews and record reviews revealed that on the day of the most recent elopement, three evening shift staff members failed to ensure that a facility door was properly latched, which allowed the resident to leave undetected for approximately two hours. The facility's elopement policy in place at the time had not been updated since 2013, and interventions in the care plan were limited to distraction techniques and routine checks of the wander guard device, without escalation in response to the resident's ongoing behaviors. There was also a lack of documentation regarding discussions with the resident's family about potential placement in a more secure unit.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙