Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0760
D

Failure to Administer Methadone as Prescribed by OTP Provider

Spokane, Washington Survey Completed on 09-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to administer methadone in accordance with the dosage prescribed by the Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) provider for a resident being treated for opioid use disorder (OUD). The resident, who had a history of Hepatitis B and C, was managed by the OTP for methadone dosing, with care plans indicating that the dosage was to be determined at weekly outpatient appointments. Following a hospital visit for an opioid overdose, the hospital coordinated with the OTP to temporarily reduce the resident's methadone dose, with a plan to gradually return to the previous dosage as directed by the OTP. Despite clear orders from the OTP to increase the methadone dose back to 70mg daily, facility staff administered only 50mg daily for several days. This change was made based on a verbal order from a physician assistant at the facility, who cited recommendations from the resident's hepatology clinic to reduce or eliminate methadone use. There was no documentation that the OTP was consulted or that care was coordinated between the OTP provider and the hepatology team regarding this change in methadone dosing. The facility did not have a specific policy for residents utilizing an OTP and relied on the OTP provider's orders for methadone administration. However, the facility did not report the deviation from the OTP's prescribed dose until questioned by OTP staff about unused medication. Interviews with facility staff revealed confusion about which provider was responsible for managing methadone dosing for OUD, and there was no evidence of direct coordination between the involved medical providers regarding the resident's methadone regimen.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙