Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Bathing Preferences

Seattle, Washington Survey Completed on 09-16-2025

Penalty

Fine: $26,125
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to reasonably accommodate the bathing preferences of two residents, resulting in unmet care needs. For one resident, documentation showed a clear preference for morning showers twice a week, as indicated in both a "Shower Preference Questionnaire" and through staff interviews. However, the resident's care plan did not reflect these preferences, and the electronic health record (EHR) scheduled showers only once a week in the evening, contrary to the resident's stated wishes. Staff confirmed that the resident's preferences were not being honored at the time of review. Another resident expressed a preference for bed baths twice a week in the evening, which was documented in the care plan and confirmed during interviews. Despite this, the EHR showed the resident was scheduled for showers or baths on specific evenings, and records indicated the resident did not receive the preferred bed baths during a specified period. Staff acknowledged that the resident's preferences were not honored and that refusals, if any, were not documented. These failures were in direct conflict with the facility's policy to honor resident choices and preferences regarding activities of daily living.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙