Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
F

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Annual Policy Review

Cheney, Washington Survey Completed on 08-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), including the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as gowns and gloves, for three out of four sampled residents who required these measures. Observations revealed that residents with conditions such as MRSA colonization, urinary catheters, and wounds did not have appropriate signage or PPE available at their room entrances, and staff were not consistently using gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities. For example, one resident with MRSA and a history of osteomyelitis and gangrene had no EBP signage or PPE at their room, and a used bandage with bloody drainage was found on the floor. Another resident with a urinary catheter did not have EBP signage or PPE receptacles at their room, and the resident reported not recalling staff wearing gowns during care. A third resident with a urinary catheter also lacked EBP signage and PPE bins, and reported staff only wore gloves, not gowns, during catheter care. Interviews with staff revealed gaps in communication and awareness regarding which residents required EBP. The Infection Prevention nurse was unaware of a resident's new catheter placement because it occurred on a day they were not present, and stated that nurses were expected to implement EBP in their absence. The nurse also missed identifying a resident as an MRSA carrier. Despite claims of a system to identify residents needing EBP, these lapses resulted in inconsistent implementation of required precautions. Additionally, the facility's infection prevention policies, including those related to EBP, had not been reviewed annually as required. All reviewed policies had a last review date from over a year prior, and staff were unclear about who was responsible for ensuring the policies were kept current. This lack of timely policy review contributed to the risk of outdated procedures being followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙