Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Supervise Cognitively Impaired Resident Leading to Unattended Departures

Spokane, Washington Survey Completed on 11-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and ensure a safe environment for a resident with significant cognitive impairment and poor safety awareness. The resident, who had a history of stroke, heart disease, encephalopathy, and demonstrated moderate to severe cognitive decline, was not initially identified as an elopement risk upon admission. Despite multiple documented instances of confusion, disorientation, and wandering behavior, the resident's care plan was not updated to reflect their cognitive decline or risk for elopement. The resident left the facility unattended on more than one occasion, including one instance where they signed themselves out and did not return as expected, prompting staff to contact the family and law enforcement. Another time, the resident left with another resident without signing out and returned after midnight. There were also episodes where the resident returned to the facility exhibiting signs of intoxication, and documentation was lacking regarding their whereabouts and the duration of their absence. Staff and family interviews confirmed the resident's ongoing confusion, lack of safety awareness, and inability to make safe decisions independently. Despite therapy and nursing notes indicating the resident's cognitive impairment and safety concerns, there was no timely update to the elopement risk assessment or care plan. The resident was not consistently identified as an elopement risk until months after the initial incidents, and interventions such as wander guard devices were not effectively implemented or documented. The lack of updated assessments and care planning contributed to the resident's repeated unsupervised departures from the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙