Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Provide Valid Basis for Declining Readmission and Inadequate Discharge Process

Salem, Virginia Survey Completed on 10-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide a valid basis for declining the readmission of a resident following a hospital stay, despite the resident having a paid bed hold and an anticipated return. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had multiple diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis, Paraplegia, Osteoarthritis, and Congestive Heart Failure, was discharged to the hospital with a return anticipated, as documented in the clinical record and MDS. Upon discharge planning, the hospital communicated that the resident and family wished to return to the facility with hospice services, and coordination between the facility and hospice was requested. However, the facility administrator declined readmission, citing the lack of a universal hospice contract and the resident's new hospice order as reasons, despite the facility's practice of individualized hospice contracts. The administrator confirmed that a discharge notice was only provided at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital, not after the decision to decline readmission. Facility policy requires documentation supporting the basis for discharge and specific unmet needs, but no further information was provided to the survey team. The surveyor's review found that the facility did not develop or implement an appropriate discharge process for the resident or their representative, and failed to ensure the transfer/discharge met the resident's needs and preferences.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙