Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Infection Control Precautions and PPE Use

Dublin, Virginia Survey Completed on 09-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to follow established infection prevention and control protocols for three residents requiring either Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) or Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). For one resident with a history of urinary tract infections and colonization with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO), staff did not don required personal protective equipment (PPE), specifically gowns, during incontinence care. The resident’s care plan and physician orders specified EBP, but staff were unaware of the precautions, and appropriate signage and PPE were not consistently available in the resident’s area. Interviews with the involved certified nurse aides revealed a lack of knowledge regarding the resident’s EBP status and the need for gowns, and the resident confirmed that staff did not wear gowns during care. Another resident with a urinary tract infection and a Foley catheter had orders and a care plan indicating the need for EBP. However, there was no visual indicator, such as a colored sticker or signage, in the resident’s room to alert staff to the required precautions. Additionally, PPE was not available on the linen carts as outlined in facility policy. The absence of these measures was confirmed by both observation and staff interviews, indicating a failure to implement the facility’s EBP process for this resident. A third resident with an active Acinetobacter infection in the urine and a provider order for contact isolation did not have appropriate TBP signage or PPE available outside the room. Staff, including CNAs and LPNs, entered and exited the room without donning PPE, and there was confusion among staff regarding the type of precautions required. The facility’s policy required signage and PPE availability for residents on TBP, but these were not in place at the time of surveyor observation. The deficiencies were discussed with facility leadership, but no additional information was provided prior to the survey exit.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙