Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0583
D

Failure to Maintain Confidentiality of Resident Clinical Records

Woodstock, Virginia Survey Completed on 09-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to maintain the confidentiality of a resident's clinical record by printing and distributing a progress note without proper authorization. An LPN was asked by another LPN, through a CNA and with the involvement of a former staffing coordinator, to print a specific progress note related to backdated medication orders for a resident. The LPN expressed hesitation but proceeded to print and hand over the document, believing she had no alternative. The document was then given to the requesting LPN, who later admitted via text message to the director of nursing that she had destroyed the document after being questioned about its possession. Interviews with administrative staff revealed confusion regarding why the document was printed, as the requesting LPN should have had access to print it herself. The executive director and director of nursing both confirmed that the document was printed and distributed without proper oversight, and the facility's own policy states that residents have a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records. The incident involved multiple staff members and resulted in a breach of confidentiality for the resident's clinical information.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙