Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Document Post-Abuse Allegation Skin Assessment

Pulaski, Virginia Survey Completed on 11-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one resident following an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse. After the allegation was reported, a registered nurse performed a skin assessment on the resident but did not document the assessment in the clinical record, as she stated she found no new findings. The resident had significant medical conditions, including congestive heart failure, altered mental status, aphasia, cerebral infarction, and cognitive communication deficit, with a recent assessment indicating severe cognitive impairment. Previous skin assessments noted bruising attributed to medication injections and blood draws, but no new documentation was made after the abuse allegation. Interviews with staff revealed that the nurse did not document the post-allegation skin assessment because she believed documentation was only necessary if new findings were present. The director of nursing stated that the expectation was for a head-to-toe skin assessment to be documented in the clinical record following any abuse allegation, either under the assessments tab or in a nursing progress note. The facility was unable to provide a specific policy regarding the accuracy of documentation in the clinical record, only a general policy on nursing care and services.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙